禽流感发生时间的政治选择(5)

By  Dr.  Leonard  Horowitz

October  12,  2005

www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=1071

Background

In  April,  2003,  a  social  experiment  called  SARS,  said  to  have  arrived  from  Asia,  heavily  struck  Toronto.  I  was  there  throughout  most  of  this  Asian  flu-foreshadowing  fright.  This  bizarre  new  pneumonia-like  illness  was  named  Severe  Acute  Respiratory  Syndrome.  It  was  said  to  be  the  latest  threat  in  an  ongoing  series  of  attacks  on  humanity  by  mysteriously  mutating  "supergerms."

A  careful  study  of  the  scientific  and  medical-sociological  correlates  and  antecedents  of  this  "outbreak"  revealed  something  amiss  far  more  insidious  than  SARS.  I  critically  considered  Toronto’s  media  reaction  as  any  Harvard-trained  public  health  expert  in  media  persuasion  behavioral  science  might.  The  scourge  had  all  the  earmarks  of  a  novel  social  experiment  conducted  by  white-collar  bioterrorist.

It  seemed  clear  to  me  that  this  unprecedented  population  manipulation  effectively  indoctrinated  the  mass  mind  in  support  of  a  grossly  ineffective,  albeit  legislated,  public  health  response  in  advance  of  the  arrival  of  "the  Big  One."  Throughout  the  "SARS  Scam,"(1)  repeated  references  were  made  to  biological  agents  that  might  facilitate  decimation  of  approximately  a  third  to  half  of  the  world's  population.  Having  extensively  reviewed  political  population  control  literature  and  contemporary  objectives  of  leading  global  industrialists,  I  noted  these  predictions  were  in  close  keeping  with  current  official  population  reduction  objectives.(2)

Canada  ’s  response  to  SARS  in  2003  was,  for  the  first  time  in  history,  directed  by  the  United  Nations  and  World  Health  Organization  (WHO).  Having  reviewed  the  intimate  financial  and  administrative  ties  between  these  organizations,  the  Rockefeller  family,  Carnegie  Foundation,  and  the  world’s  leading  drug  makers,  "the  fox,"  in  essence,  reigned  over  Canada’s  "chickens."

The  truth  about  plagues  includes  the  fact  that  "no  grand  pandemic  ever  evolved  divorced  from  major  socio-political  upheaval."  SARS  advanced  a  political  agenda  more  than  a  public  health  emergency.  If  public  health  officials  earnestly  intended  to  prevent  these  new  emerging  diseases,  or  successfully  treat  them  at  their  roots,  I  repeated,  they  would  study  their  obvious  origins  from  the  merged  military-medical-biotechnology  arena.  A  basic  course  in  medical  sociology  simply  justifies  this  utilitarian  counsel.   (责任编辑：泉水)

搜索

热门标签:

禽流感发生时间的政治选择(5)