禽流感发生时间的政治选择(6)

"Experts"  had  been  predicting  the  arrival  of  a  super-plague  for  decades.  What  was  HIGHLY  SUSPICIOUS  about  the  mysterious  and  terrifying  arrival  of  SARS,  however,  was  its  timing.  It  synchronously  arrived  with  the  global  war  on  terrorism,  and  the  Anglo-American  war  with  Iraq.  It  seemed  a  convenient  distraction  from  the  fact  that  the  earlier  Bush  administration  had  shipped  Saddam  Hussein  most  of  his  deadly  biological  weapons  arsenal  including  anthrax  and  West  Nile  Virus.  SARS  was  pathognomonic  (i.e.,  symptomatic  and  characteristic)  of  what  I  had  predicted  and  explained  in  the  book,  Death  in  the  Air:  Globalism,  Terrorism  and  Toxic  Warfare  (Tetrahedron  Publishing  Group,  2001;  http://www.healthyworlddistributing.com),  a  prophetically-titled  text  that  predated  the  9-11  attacks  on  America  by  several  months,  and  provided  a  contextual  analysis  of  certain  globalists’  links  to  recent  "outbreaks."

In  essence,  I  provided  insight  into  the  broad  application  of  a  new  form  of  institutionalized  "bioterrorism"  consistent  with  state  sponsored  biological  warfare.  Saddam  Hussein  was  said  to  have  exposed  populations  in  his  and  adjacent  lands  with  biological  and  chemical  weapons  of  mass  destruction.  SARS  and  the  current  avian  flu  fright  is  sanctioned  by  military-medical-pharmaceutical-petrochemical  industrialists  likewise  operating  above  the  law  in  many  documented  instances.  Having  testified  before  the  U.S.  Congress,  I  personally  experienced  how  premiere  pharmaceutical  industrialists  direct  our  political-economic  representatives  in  government.  Emerging  diseases  complement  the  political  "War  on  Terrorism,"  and  our  bioterror-influenced  culture.  This  agenda  serves  two  primary  objectives:  profitability  and  population-reduction.

Political  Reality  Versus  Mass-Mediated  Myths

The  ever  increasing  madness  around  us  is  eerily  consistent  with  globalist  think  tank  recommendations  for  the  current  "conflicts  short  of  war."  Beginning  in  the  late  1960s,  "economic  substitutes  for  standard  militarization"  were  sought  and  found  by  leading  global  industrialists.  New  biological  threats,  the  "war  on  terrorism,"  and  increasing  numbers  of  "natural  disasters"  including  space-based  threats  and  superstorms  were  considered  economically  and  politically  expedient  compared  with  the  first  and  second  world  wars.  These  "conflicts  short  of  war"  were  decidedly  more  manageable  and  economically  viable.  For  this  reason,  especially  their  profitability,  they  were  leading  options  among  Anglo-American  policy  makers.   (责任编辑：泉水)

搜索

热门标签:

禽流感发生时间的政治选择(6)